Monday, December 20, 2010

My correspondence with an abortionist, Part III

(Continued. For Part I and Part II, read here and here.)

I won't keep you in suspense! Below is the response that we received from abortionist Finkel. It does make one wonder: Did he read the same letter we wrote?? The saga doesn't end here, but for now, read on....

(Note: I have left all of the typos intact.)

7 September 1995


Dear Manning and Miller:


I am receipt of your letter of September 6, 1995. I read it with great interest and with amusement. I have always found that Pro-Lifers find my secular comments concerning their mystical beliefs to be hostile. It seems that an objective appraisal of your "relatively mild Pro-Life statement" has upset your apple cart, resulting in more parroting of the Pro-Life mantra.


Hippocrates, in the Hippocratic Oath, proscribes giving a woman a pessary for an abortion. Hippocrates does not proscribe abortion, but only a technique of an induced abortion. This polytheistic physician knew then what contemporary physicians know now. They placement of a non-sterile foreign object in a woman's uterus to induce an abortion would result in sepsis and death of the woman. The Pro-Lifers have edited Hippocrates' admonition to their political viewpoint, and claim that he has admonished all abortion procedures. I feel quite confident that this ancient physician, if he had access to sterile instruments and sterile technique, that he too would be a proponent of contemporary abortion practices.


Mainstream Arizonan's do not view me with as much suspicion and distaste as Pro-Lifers. The working Jane Doe of Arizona and my peers in the medical community view me as a valuable community asset. I am a much loved and highly respected physician in this state. It is only the Pro-Life bigots in this community that marginalize, demonize, and vilify my good works. I laughed out loud at your "offer to euthanize our toddlers". It made me want to polish my horns and my cloven hooves!


For your information, I do advise my patients about the adoption option. Each and every one of the women who comes to my office for abortion services has anguished over that option, and has found it too painful to even consider. The women who most condemn the adoption versus abortion route are those women who have already placed a child into adoption. Each and every one of these patients advises me that placing a child up for adoption was the most painful decision they have ever made, and one they will never make again.


I am not at all surprised that you have refused my invitation to visit my office and witness the circumstances that compel the women of Arizona to seek abortions. Your Pro-Life sand castle would have been washed away by the sea of reality. It is easier for you to stay in the ivory towers of the Republic Editorial Board, where your spiritual beliefs are unchallenged. Your mewling and whining about how you avoid or even dread writing articles on abortion is hypocritical to the point of nausea.


In your arrogance, you tell me that you find what I do reprehensible. I am a servant of women. I provide them with service that they want, need, and seek out. I am a physician; not a prosecutor. I do not project or inflict my personal spiritual beliefs into the personal tragedies of my patients. They seek me out because other physicians in the community will not provide or are afraid to provide abortion services to the women under their care. I take a great amount of pride in being there for the woman of Arizona when they need a physician and a friend. My only regret is that their are so many women that need my help, and that there is so little time to help them.


I agree that there is satisfaction in civilized discourse. When you stop peppering your antiabortion editorials with inflammatory and pejorative noun, I will know that you are ready to negotiate.


Once again, I offer you an opportunity to come to my office. My office is not an abortuary, and I am not the big, bad evil boogy man of your Pro-Life nightmares. I will continue to read your column every two weeks. I wan to see how long it takes you to put aside your avoidance and dread of writing articles on abortion, and once again begin your tirade as a third party who has no standing in the interaction between me and my patients.


With best personal regards.


I remain very truly yours,


[signature]


Brian L. Finkel, D.O., F.A.C.O.G.



(Stacy, you were right on!)

If you like poetic justice, stay tuned for the next two posts.

To be continued....

16 comments:

  1. I don't even know what to say. This wasn't what I was expecting at all. I'm speechless.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leila, so I was interested and I googled him. In his mind he still doesn't believe he ever did anything wrong.

    http://www.writeaprisoner.com/template.aspx?i=z-182486

    Your blog came up second. Thanks for posting this. You and Kim made a very articulate and kind response, it's hard to imagine how he read it the way he did.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stacy, so interesting!! Yes, there is something wrong with his mind and/or soul. More soon....

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm really hoping this exchange ends with you going over there, talking to his 'clients', and saving a bunch of women and babies!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This honestly makes me shiver... even if I was okay with abortion, this guy sounds nasty. And from a fell0w writer/editor's perspective - this guy is delusional if he doesn't see the hostility oozing out of his letters. Not to mention the arrogance which seems to completely blind him from accurately reading your letter.

    "Love" the part about women giving babies up for adoption, too. I guess that article we ran awhile back written by a woman who gave her baby up for adoption 27 years ago saying she was thankful for the life she was able to provide for her child must have been a sham. But hey, what do I know! I am not almighty Dr. Finkel, superhero to the downtrodden and distressed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have heard the argument that it's "too hard" to put a baby up for adoption so abortion is the only option. I'm still shocked every time. How is it easier to kill your child than give them a chance for life with someone else?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I googled him and found a page where a journalist went into one of his abortions. I could not believe my eyes. I felt phyisically sick and so very sad.

    I am so proud of you for writing to him and making the truth heard (even if he did clearly not want to hear it).

    Him being in jail does not surprise me

    ReplyDelete
  8. Woah! I can't believe he's in prison and for such a long term too! Now it's even creepier that he keeps insisting you come to his office. Ew. I'd also second the fact that he sounds extremely arrogant.
    -Chrissy

    ReplyDelete
  9. err, after googling the guy too i retract my statment. i hope you didn't go anywhere near him!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Unbelievable. He doesn't think he was hostile at all?!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Um, oh.my.gosh. JoAnna I just read that link. That's exactly the vibe his letters give - that he is creepy/abusive (although you never want to assume that about a person just because they sound off).

    ReplyDelete

PLEASE, when commenting, do not hit "reply" (which is the thread option). Instead, please put your comment at the bottom of the others.

To ensure that you don't miss any comments, click the "subscribe by email" link, above. If you do not subscribe and a post exceeds 200 comments, you must hit "load more" to get to the rest. We often have meaty and long discussions -- trust me, they're worth following!